Cover of: Moral Responsibility and Global Justice | Christine Chwaszcza Read Online
Share

Moral Responsibility and Global Justice A Human Rights Approach (Studies in Political Theory) by Christine Chwaszcza

  • 939 Want to read
  • ·
  • 72 Currently reading

Published .
Written in English

Subjects:

  • Civics & Citizenship,
  • International Relations - General,
  • Political Science,
  • Politics/International Relations

Book details:

The Physical Object
FormatPaperback
Number of Pages203
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL12979797M
ISBN 103832928782
ISBN 109783832928780

Download Moral Responsibility and Global Justice

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

moral responsibility and global justice This two-volume Encyclopedia of Global Justice, published by Springer, along with Springer's book series, Studies in Global Justice, is a major publication venture toward a comprehensive coverage of this timely topic. The Encyclopedia is an international, interdisciplinary, and collaborative project. Moral responsibility and global justice: a human rights approach. [Christine Chwaszcza] -- Previous edition, 1st, published in Your Web browser is not enabled for JavaScript. Some features of WorldCat will not be available. Interpreted as standards of legitimacy for institutions, the concept of human rights offers a fruitful normative heuristic for determining the moral status of individual persons in international relations and for assessing collective responsibilities of transnational justice among political tomsseweranddrainserviceoh.com by: 7. Global Ethics and Moral Responsibility: Hans Jonas and his Critics, 1st Edition (Hardback) - Routledge The philosophy of Hans Jonas was widely influential in the late twentieth century, warning of the potential dangers of technological progress and its negative effect on humanity and nature.

Jan 07,  · RESPONSIBILITY AND GLOBAL JUSTICE: A SOCIAL CONNECTION MODEL. To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon tomsseweranddrainserviceoh.com by: Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1) () The essay theorizes the responsibilities moral agents may be said to have in relation to global structural social processes that have unjust tomsseweranddrainserviceoh.com: /S Dec 28,  · Somehow the translation of moral impulse into universal, globally binding standards of honesty, fairness, justice and responsibility has gone astray. What the "artificial hands' of morally sensitive residents of the fast globalising world do bears little if . In the contemporary global justice debate, the general issue of impartiality centers on the moral significance of borders and of shared citizenship. Realists, particularists, nationalists, members of the society of states tradition, and cosmopolitans take contesting positions in response to these problems.

Global justice theories can be classed into four main perspectives: realism, particularism, social contractarianism (society of states), and cosmopolitanism. The idea of “global justice” is controversial. Indeed, some theories deny altogether the applicability of justice in the global tomsseweranddrainserviceoh.com: Jennifer Prah Ruger. Oct 22,  · In order to see anthropogenic climate change as clearly involving moral wrongs and global injustices, we will have to revise some central concepts in these domains. Moreover, climate change threatens another value (“respect for nature”) that cannot easily be taken up by concerns of global justice or moral tomsseweranddrainserviceoh.com by: Get this from a library! Moral responsibility and global justice: a human rights approach. [Christine Chwaszcza]. Jul 30,  · Moral Responsibility. It is commonly argued that if we do not have free will, then we cannot be held responsible for our actions. In some sense this statement is correct, but in another sense it is meaningless. The traditional definition of moral responsibility would hold responsible the person or persons who caused some event.